2.10 Solving equations graphically and analyticallyIB Maths: Analysis and Approaches SL: Revision notes
Section 1
Solving analytically: disguised quadratics
Many exponential equations are quadratics in disguise. Look for a term that is the square of another:
- , so let .
- and .
or , so or .
Always substitute back and check each value of : since and , any negative or zero value of gives no solution.
Stopping at or . The question asks for , so solve and .
Keeping . An exponential is always positive, so reject it and give a reason.
Section 2
Solving graphically with a GDC
Some equations, such as , or , have no appropriate analytic method. Use technology:
- Graph left side and right side, and find the -coordinates of the intersections; or
- Rearrange to and find the zeros of .
Give answers to 3 significant figures unless told otherwise, and give every solution: check the window is wide enough to see them all.
Giving the -coordinate of an intersection instead of the -coordinate. For the solution is , not .
Before using the GDC, reason about how many solutions to expect: at but far to each side, so there are two.
Section 3
Inequalities from graphs
Once the intersections are known, an inequality is solved by deciding which graph is above the other in each region. For with intersections at and , the exponential is above the line outside these values: or .
Analytically, work with the substitution: .
Section 4
Equations with a parameter
If a disguised quadratic has a parameter, such as with , count solutions for carefully:
- each positive root gives exactly one ;
- zero or negative roots give none.
So 'exactly one solution' can come from a repeated positive root (), or from one positive and one non-positive root. Check the sign of the roots, not just the discriminant.
For , the product of the roots is and the sum is . If and , both real roots are positive.
Section 5
Equations in real-life contexts
Models often lead to equations such as (when do two populations become equal?). Use a GDC, then interpret:
- Convert to a real time: if is years after 1 January 2020, then falls during 2037.
- State units and sensible accuracy (e.g. 56.4 thousand people).
- Comment on validity: a linear model becomes negative for , which is impossible for a population.
Adding to the year incorrectly: years after the start of 2020 is early 2037, not 2017 or 2038.
Must know
- Spot hidden quadratics: , ; substitute, solve, substitute back.
- Reject values of that make or zero or negative, with a reason.
- With a GDC: use intersections or zeros; find every solution; 3 significant figures.
- Inequalities: find intersections, then decide which graph is above.
- In context, interpret solutions in real units and comment on the model's validity.
That's the notes covered.
Carry on to the next subtopic.