All revision notes topics

1.6 Simple deductive proofIB Maths: Analysis and Approaches HL: Revision notes

Section 1

What is a deductive proof?

A deductive proof starts from facts you already accept (definitions, algebraic rules, earlier results) and uses a chain of logical steps to reach a conclusion that must be true. Checking a few examples is not a proof: n2+n+41n^2+n+41 is prime for n=0,1,…,39n = 0, 1, \ldots, 39 but not for n=40n = 40.

At SL you need two kinds:

  • Algebraic proofs, where you show two expressions are always equal.
  • Numerical proofs about integers, for example that the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3.
Key termsdeductive proof
Common mistake

Testing n=1,2,3n=1, 2, 3 and writing “so it is always true”. Examples can support a conjecture or disprove it, but never prove it for all cases.

Section 2

Equality (=) and identity (≡)

An equation such as x2=4xx^2 = 4x is true only for particular values (x=0x = 0 or x=4x = 4). An identity is true for every value of the variable, and is written with the symbol ≡\equiv:(x−3)2+5≡x2−6x+14.(x-3)^2 + 5 \equiv x^2 - 6x + 14.When a question says “show that ... ≡\equiv ...” you must prove it holds for all xx, not solve it.

Key termsidentityequation
Exam tip

If substituting two or three values gives the same result on both sides, the identity is plausible — now prove it algebraically.

Section 3

Laying out an LHS to RHS proof

Start with one side (usually the more complicated one), transform it using known algebraic steps, and finish with the other side:

LHS =(x−3)2+5= (x-3)^2 + 5 =x2−6x+9+5= x^2 - 6x + 9 + 5 =x2−6x+14== x^2 - 6x + 14 = RHS.

Each line follows from the one before. Do not write the whole identity on every line and operate on both sides — that assumes what you are trying to prove.

Key termsLHSRHS
Common mistake

Starting with (x−3)2+5=x2−6x+14(x-3)^2+5 = x^2-6x+14 and simplifying both sides until you get 0=00 = 0. This is not an acceptable LHS to RHS proof.

Example

Show (2x−5)2−4(x−1)(x−4)≡9(2x-5)^2 - 4(x-1)(x-4) \equiv 9: LHS =4x2−20x+25−4(x2−5x+4)=4x2−20x+25−4x2+20x−16=9== 4x^2-20x+25 - 4(x^2-5x+4) = 4x^2-20x+25-4x^2+20x-16 = 9 = RHS.

Section 4

Proofs about integers

Write general integers algebraically:

  • any integer: nn; consecutive integers: nn, n+1n+1, n+2n+2 (or n−1n-1, nn, n+1n+1)
  • an even number: 2n2n; an odd number: 2n+12n+1; consecutive odd numbers: 2n+12n+1, 2n+32n+3
  • a multiple of kk: k×k\times(an integer)

Then simplify and factorise to show the required property. For example (2m+3)2−(2m+1)2=8m+8=8(m+1)(2m+3)^2-(2m+1)^2 = 8m+8 = 8(m+1), and because m+1m+1 is an integer, this is a multiple of 8. Always state why the bracket is an integer.

Key termsevenoddmultiple
Common mistake

Using 2n+12n+1 and 2n+32n+3 for two unrelated odd numbers — that forces them to be consecutive. Use different letters (2a+12a+1, 2b+12b+1) when the numbers are independent.

Section 5

Checking a result

The syllabus expects you to check results. After proving an identity, substitute a convenient value and confirm both sides agree: for P+1≡(2m+2)2P + 1 \equiv (2m+2)^2 with P=(2m+1)(2m+3)P=(2m+1)(2m+3) and m=4m = 4, 9×11+1=100=1029\times 11 + 1 = 100 = 10^2.

A check does not replace the proof, but it catches expansion and sign errors. Choose values that are easy to work with but not special cases like 00 or 11, which can hide mistakes.

Key termscheck
Exam tip

In a number-trick question, run the trick with one actual number at the end to confirm your algebra.

Must know

  • An example is not a proof; a deductive proof covers every case.
  • == may hold only for some values; ≡\equiv holds for all values.
  • LHS to RHS: begin with one side, finish with the other, one valid step per line.
  • Integers: nn, n+1n+1; even 2n2n; odd 2n+12n+1. Factorise to show a multiple, and say why the factor is an integer.
  • Check your result with a numerical substitution.

That's the notes covered.

Carry on to the next subtopic.