All revision notes topics

Physical properties of Period 3 elementsAQA A-Level Chemistry: Revision notes

Section 1

Atomic radius across Period 3

Atomic radius decreases from sodium to chlorine (0.186 nm to 0.099 nm).

  • The nuclear charge increases by one proton for each element.
  • The extra electrons go into the same shell (n = 3), so the shielding stays about the same.
  • The outer electrons are therefore attracted more strongly to the nucleus and are pulled closer.

Argon is not usually included in this comparison, because it is monatomic and forms no covalent bonds, so its radius is measured in a different way.

Key termsatomic radiusshielding
Common mistake

Do not say the number of shells changes across a period. It stays the same; the change is in nuclear charge.

Section 2

First ionisation energy across Period 3

The first ionisation energy is the energy needed to remove one electron from each atom in one mole of gaseous atoms to form one mole of gaseous 1+ ions. Across Period 3 there is a general increase (Na 496 to Ar 1521 kJ mol⁻¹) because:

  • nuclear charge increases
  • electrons are removed from the same shell with similar shielding
  • atomic radius decreases, so the attraction is stronger.

There are two dips in the trend:

  • Mg to Al (738 to 578): the outer electron of Al is in a 3p sub-shell, which is higher in energy and further from the nucleus than 3s, and is partly shielded by the 3s electrons. It is easier to remove.
  • P to S (1012 to 1000): in S the 3p electrons begin to pair (3p⁴). The two electrons in the same orbital repel each other, so one is easier to remove than from P (3p³, all unpaired).
Key termsfirst ionisation energy
Exam tip

Name the sub-shell and the reason (3p higher in energy, or electron-pair repulsion) when explaining the dips. 'Greater nuclear charge' does not explain a decrease.

Section 3

Melting points: metals

Sodium, magnesium and aluminium are metallic. Their lattices have positive ions attracted to delocalised electrons.

Melting point increases from Na to Al (371 K, 923 K, 933 K) because:

  • the ionic charge increases, 1+, 2+, 3+
  • the number of delocalised electrons per atom increases, 1, 2, 3
  • the ions get smaller, so the charge density is higher.

The attraction between ions and electrons is stronger, so more energy is needed to overcome it.

Key termsmetallic bondingdelocalised electrons

Section 4

Melting points: silicon and molecular elements

Silicon has a giant covalent (macromolecular) structure, each atom bonded to four others by strong covalent bonds. Melting requires many of these bonds to be broken, so silicon has the highest melting point in the period (1687 K).

Phosphorus (P₄), sulfur (S₈), chlorine (Cl₂) and argon (Ar) are simple molecular (argon is monatomic). Melting only needs the weak London forces between the molecules to be overcome, not the covalent bonds within them. The melting points are low.

London forces get stronger with more electrons, so the order is S₈ > P₄ > Cl₂ > Ar: S₈ has 128 electrons, P₄ 60, Cl₂ 34 and Ar 18.

Key termsgiant covalentLondon forces
Common mistake

Melting simple molecular substances does not break covalent bonds. Do not write 'the covalent bonds are weak'.

That's the notes covered.

Carry on to the next subtopic.

Exam questions on Physical properties of Period 3 elements

  1. The atomic radius of the elements decreases across Period 3, from 0.186 nm for sodium to 0.099 nm for chlorine.
    Explain why the atomic radius decreases from sodium to chlorine.2 marks
  2. The first ionisation energies of the Period 3 elements (in kJ mol⁻¹) are: Na 496, Mg 738, Al 578, Si 786, P 1012, S 1000, Cl 1251, Ar 1521.
    Explain why the first ionisation energy of argon is much higher than that of sodium.2 marks
  3. The melting points of four Period 3 elements are: sodium 371 K, magnesium 923 K, aluminium 933 K and silicon 1687 K.
    Explain why magnesium has a higher melting point than sodium.3 marks
See the full worksheet

Written by the Exaim team, led by Shaun Daswani (Head of Upper Secondary, Improve ME Institute; MSc Financial Mathematics, Imperial College London; BSc, UCL) and Jason Daswani (operational lead, Improve ME Institute; LSE).