Errors, uncertainties and error barsAQA A-Level Physics: Revision notes
Section 1
Random and systematic errors
A random error causes readings to scatter unpredictably above and below the true value, for example from reaction time or reading a scale by eye. It can be reduced by taking repeat readings and calculating a mean, or by using a larger sample or equipment with finer resolution.
A systematic error shifts all readings by the same amount or proportion in the same direction, for example a zero error, a wrongly calibrated instrument or always viewing a scale from the same wrong angle. Repeating does not remove it. Reduce it by checking the zero, calibrating against a known standard, correcting readings, or using a different method.
Averaging repeats does not remove a systematic error. Say that random errors cancel in the mean, but a systematic error is still present.
Section 2
Precision, repeatability, reproducibility, resolution and accuracy
- Precision: how close repeated readings are to each other (small scatter).
- Repeatability: the same person, method and equipment give closely agreeing results.
- Reproducibility: different people or equipment, or a different method, give closely agreeing results.
- Resolution: the smallest change in the quantity that an instrument can detect (e.g. 0.01 mm on a micrometer).
- Accuracy: how close a reading is to the true value.
A set of readings can be precise but inaccurate if a systematic error shifts them all.
Section 3
Absolute, fractional and percentage uncertainty
An uncertainty gives the range within which the true value is expected to lie.
- Absolute uncertainty: ΔX, with the same unit as X, e.g. 2.00 ± 0.02 cm.
- Fractional uncertainty: ΔX ÷ X.
- Percentage uncertainty: (ΔX ÷ X) × 100%.
From repeat readings, the uncertainty in the mean can be taken as half the range (largest minus smallest, divided by 2). For a single reading it is at least the instrument resolution.
The number of significant figures in a value should match its uncertainty: an uncertainty of ±0.02 cm goes with a value quoted to the nearest 0.01 cm, so write 2.00 ± 0.02 cm, not 2.0 ± 0.02 cm or 2.000 ± 0.02 cm. Give an uncertainty to 1 significant figure (2 if it starts with 1).
Section 4
Combining uncertainties
- Adding or subtracting quantities: add the absolute uncertainties. If a = 4.0 ± 0.2 cm and b = 6.0 ± 0.3 cm then a + b = 10.0 ± 0.5 cm, and b − a = 2.0 ± 0.5 cm.
- Multiplying or dividing: add the percentage uncertainties.
- Raising to a power: multiply the percentage uncertainty by the power. For a cube of side 2.00 ± 0.02 cm (1.0%), the volume has uncertainty 3 × 1.0% = 3.0%.
Worked example. Density = 85.0 g ÷ 8.00 cm³ with 0.59% in mass and 3.0% in volume. Total = 3.6%, so ρ = 10.6 g cm⁻³ ± 3.6% = 10.6 ± 0.4 g cm⁻³.
You do not combine uncertainties for trigonometric or logarithmic functions at this level.
When subtracting, the absolute uncertainties are still added, never subtracted. A small difference of two large readings can have a very large percentage uncertainty.
Section 5
Error bars and the uncertainty in a gradient and intercept
An error bar on a data point shows the range of its uncertainty, vertically, horizontally or both. Individual points may or may not have error bars.
To find the uncertainty in a straight-line gradient:
- Draw a best-fit line through the points.
- Draw a worst acceptable line (steepest or shallowest) that still passes through all the error bars.
- Calculate both gradients using a large triangle.
- Uncertainty in gradient = difference between the best and worst gradients.
The intercept is treated the same way. If theory predicts that the line passes through the origin but the intercept range does not include zero, a systematic error is likely.
Must Know
- Random errors scatter readings and are reduced by repeats; systematic errors shift readings and are reduced by calibration or correcting the method
- Precision is about scatter, accuracy is about closeness to the true value
- Percentage uncertainty = absolute ÷ value × 100
- Add absolute uncertainties for + and −; add percentage uncertainties for × and ÷; multiply by the power for powers
- Gradient uncertainty = best gradient − worst gradient
That's the notes covered.
Carry on to the next subtopic.
Exam questions on Errors, uncertainties and error bars
- A student measures the diameter of a wire with a micrometer screw gauge that reads to the nearest 0.01 mm. With the jaws closed and nothing between them, the gauge reads 0.02 mm. The student then measures the diameter at five different places along the wire and the readings vary slightly, between 0.41 mm and 0.45 mm.Explain why calculating the mean of the readings taken at the five places reduces the effect of random error but does not remove the zero error.2 marks
- A student determines the density of a metal cube. The mass of the cube is 85.0 ± 0.5 g and the length of each side is 2.00 ± 0.02 cm.Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the density of the metal.2 marks
- A student times 20 complete oscillations of a simple pendulum of length 0.800 ± 0.002 m. The time for 20 oscillations is 35.9 ± 0.4 s. The acceleration of free fall can be found from g = 4π²L/T², where T is the period of the pendulum.Calculate the period T of the pendulum and its absolute uncertainty.3 marks
Written by the Exaim team, led by Shaun Daswani (Head of Upper Secondary, Improve ME Institute; MSc Financial Mathematics, Imperial College London; BSc, UCL) and Jason Daswani (operational lead, Improve ME Institute; LSE).