Proof by deduction, exhaustion and counter-exampleEdexcel A-Level Maths: Revision notes
Section 1
The structure of a proof
A proof starts from given assumptions, moves through a series of logical steps and ends with a conclusion. Each step must follow from the one before, and the last line should state what has been proved, for example 'so the sum is always odd'. Use for 'implies' and when the reasoning works in both directions. Testing a few values is not a proof. It can suggest a result, but a proof must work for every case covered by the statement. Three methods are needed at AS: deduction, exhaustion and disproof by counter-example.
Substituting numbers and saying 'it works, so it is proved'. Examples never prove a general statement.
Section 2
Proof by deduction
In proof by deduction you start from known facts and use algebra to reach the result for all cases at once.
- Even and odd: an even integer is and an odd integer is . Consecutive integers are and . The sum of the squares of two consecutive integers is , which is always odd.
- Completing the square: . Since , the expression is at least 1, so it is positive for all real .
- Divisibility: show the expression equals the divisor multiplied by an integer, for example where is even, so the result is a multiple of 4. End with a sentence linking back to the claim, such as 'so the expression is a multiple of 4 for every integer '.
Use a different letter for each independent integer, for example and , so you do not force them to be equal.
Section 3
Deduction with differentiation and series
The same method proves standard results. First principles. For : as , so . Arithmetic series. Write and reverse it. Adding the two lines gives , so . Geometric series. and . Subtracting gives , so for .
Section 4
Proof by exhaustion
In proof by exhaustion you split the possibilities into a finite number of cases and show the statement is true for every case. Example: prove is a multiple of 12 for primes . The primes are , and the values are . To use exhaustion you must (1) list all the cases with none missing, (2) check each one, and (3) conclude. It only works when the number of cases is finite, or can be reduced to a finite number, for example by considering even and odd.
Leaving out a case, or listing 9 or 15 as primes. A missing or wrong case breaks the proof.
Section 5
Disproof by counter-example
To show a statement is false you only need one counter-example: a single value that satisfies the conditions but fails the claim. Example: 'for all , is prime' is untrue because gives , which is not prime. Check the counter-example carefully and state clearly why it fails. In contrast, to prove a statement true you need a general argument. Finding many examples that work does not prove it. For instance is prime for but gives .
Choose a counter-example you can check easily. Show the arithmetic and state the conclusion, such as 'so the statement is false'.
Section 6
Choosing a method
- Statement about all integers or all real numbers: deduction (algebra).
- Finite list of possibilities, such as primes below 25: exhaustion.
- Statement claimed true that you think is false: look for a counter-example. A good write-up states the assumptions, shows each logical step, and ends with a conclusion in words. Use ('therefore') or 'hence' to show how lines follow.
If the question says 'prove', give a general argument. If it says 'show that' with specific numbers, you are checking a particular case.
That's the notes covered.
Carry on to the next subtopic.
Exam questions on Proof by deduction, exhaustion and counter-example
- A student claims that is a prime number for every positive integer .Show that the claim is false for , and state what type of proof this is.2 marks
- The function is defined for all real .Hence prove that is positive for all real .2 marks
- Two consecutive integers are and , where is an integer.Prove that the sum of the squares of the two integers is always odd.3 marks
Written by the Exaim team, led by Shaun Daswani (Head of Upper Secondary, Improve ME Institute; MSc Financial Mathematics, Imperial College London; BSc, UCL) and Jason Daswani (operational lead, Improve ME Institute; LSE).