All revision notes topics

Proof by contradictionEdexcel International A Level Maths: Revision notes

Section 1

The method

To prove a statement PP by contradiction: (1) assume that PP is false, that is assume the negation of PP; (2) argue logically from that assumption; (3) reach a result that is impossible, such as a number that is both even and odd, or a statement that contradicts the assumption or a known fact; (4) conclude that the assumption was wrong, so PP is true. Each step must follow from the one before. The contradiction is the whole point, so state it clearly, for example 'this contradicts the assumption that pp and qq have no common factor'. Negations: the negation of 'for all nn, n2n^2 is even' is 'there exists an integer nn with n2n^2 odd'; the negation of 'there is no integer with...' is 'there is an integer with...'; the negation of 'irrational' is 'rational'.

Key termsproof by contradictionnegationcontradiction
Common mistake

Assuming the statement to be proved, or a wrong negation such as 'is an integer' instead of 'is rational'. Write the negation down before you start.

Section 2

Proof that 2\sqrt2 is irrational

Assume 2=pq\sqrt2=\frac{p}{q} where p,qp,q are integers with no common factor (the fraction is in its lowest terms) and q≠0q\neq0. Squaring, 2=p2q22=\frac{p^2}{q^2}, so p2=2q2p^2=2q^2. So p2p^2 is even, and therefore pp is even (the square of an odd number is odd). Write p=2kp=2k. Then 4k2=2q24k^2=2q^2, so q2=2k2q^2=2k^2, so q2q^2 is even and qq is even. Now pp and qq are both even, so they share the factor 2. This contradicts the assumption that they have no common factor. Therefore 2\sqrt2 is irrational. The same argument shows that 3\sqrt3, 5\sqrt5 and p\sqrt p for any prime pp are irrational.

Key termsrationalirrationallowest terms
Exam tip

The 'no common factor' condition is what produces the contradiction at the end, so state it in your first line.

Section 3

Proof that there are infinitely many primes

Assume there are only finitely many primes, p1,p2,…,pnp_1,p_2,\ldots,p_n. Let N=p1p2⋯pn+1N=p_1p_2\cdots p_n+1. Dividing NN by any pip_i leaves remainder 1, so no pip_i divides NN. But N>1N>1 has at least one prime factor. That prime factor is not in the list. This contradicts the assumption that the list contains all the primes. So there are infinitely many primes. Note that NN need not itself be prime: with the primes up to 13, N=30031=59×509N=30031=59\times509, and the argument works because 5959 and 509509 are primes outside the list.

Key termsprimeprime factorremainder
Common mistake

Claiming that NN is prime. The argument only needs NN to have a prime factor that is not in the list.

Section 4

Unfamiliar proofs: parity and divisibility

Many unfamiliar proofs rely on a few facts. An integer is either even or odd, never both. The square of an even number is even and of an odd number is odd. If a product of integers is even, at least one factor is even. If a number is a multiple of 7, so is any integer multiple of it. Examples: (1) There are no integers with 14m+21n=114m+21n=1: assume there are, then 7(2m+3n)=17(2m+3n)=1, so 2m+3n=172m+3n=\frac17, which is not an integer. (2) log⁡23\log_23 is irrational: assume log⁡23=pq\log_23=\frac{p}{q} with positive integers, so 2p=3q2^p=3^q, which is even equals odd. (3) x2−y2=2x^2-y^2=2 has no integer solutions: (x−y)(x+y)=2(x-y)(x+y)=2, and the factors have the same parity, so both are even and the product is a multiple of 4, not 2.

Key termsparityfactormultiple
Exam tip

Look for a property such as parity, a common factor or divisibility that the assumption forces on both sides of an equation.

Section 5

Using a known irrational number

You may use the fact that 2\sqrt2 is irrational to prove other numbers irrational. To show 2+3\sqrt2+\sqrt3 is irrational, assume 2+3=r\sqrt2+\sqrt3=r with rr rational. Then 3=r−2\sqrt3=r-\sqrt2; squaring gives 3=r2−2r2+23=r^2-2r\sqrt2+2, so 2=r2−12r\sqrt2=\frac{r^2-1}{2r}. The right-hand side is rational, which contradicts the irrationality of 2\sqrt2. Rational numbers are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication and division by a non-zero number, so combining rationals gives a rational. Isolate a root, square, and arrange so that a known irrational equals a rational expression.

Key termsclosedisolate
Common mistake

Dividing by 2r2r without noting that r≠0r\neq0 (here r>0r>0).

Section 6

Writing a proof

Layout: 'Assume that ... (the negation)'; then each step with a reason; then 'This contradicts ...'; finally 'Hence ... is true'. Do not skip the conclusion. Do not test examples: a few numerical cases never prove a general statement. A contradiction can be with the assumption itself, with a given fact, or with a basic truth such as 'even = odd'. If you reach something that is merely unlikely, it is not a contradiction.

Exam tip

End with the sentence that names what has been proved, such as 'Hence there are infinitely many primes'.

That's the notes covered.

Carry on to the next subtopic.

Exam questions on Proof by contradiction

  1. A student begins a proof by contradiction that 2\sqrt2 is irrational.
    Given that p2=2q2p^2=2q^2 and so pp is even, complete the proof.2 marks
  2. Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many primes begins by assuming that there are only finitely many primes, p1,p2,…,pnp_1,p_2,\ldots,p_n. Let N=p1p2⋯pn+1N=p_1p_2\cdots p_n+1.
    A student takes the first six primes, 2,3,5,7,11,132,3,5,7,11,13, so N=30031N=30031. Show that NN is not prime, and state what this shows about Euclid's argument.2 marks
  3. In a proof by contradiction you assume that the statement is false and show that this leads to an impossible result.
    Prove by contradiction that there are no integers mm and nn such that 14m+21n=114m+21n=1.3 marks
See the full worksheet

Written by the Exaim team, led by Shaun Daswani (Head of Upper Secondary, Improve ME Institute; MSc Financial Mathematics, Imperial College London; BSc, UCL) and Jason Daswani (operational lead, Improve ME Institute; LSE).